<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chastain v. Kansas City and The Hancock Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kclightrail.com/2007/07/18/chastain-v-kansas-city-and-the-hancock-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kclightrail.com/2007/07/18/chastain-v-kansas-city-and-the-hancock-amendment/</link>
	<description>Your source for news and information on Kansas City's light rail progress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:18:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: northlander</title>
		<link>http://kclightrail.com/2007/07/18/chastain-v-kansas-city-and-the-hancock-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator>northlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 11:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kclightrail.com/2007/07/18/chastain-v-kansas-city-and-the-hancock-amendment/#comment-1383</guid>
		<description>So how many tax&#039;s can KC take with another transit tax and water/sewer tax and the large poperty tax people will star moving out. It&#039;s 10% now at the boats and 9.225 in other parts of KC..

Someone soon will go up aganist Clay&#039;s plan to stop it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how many tax&#8217;s can KC take with another transit tax and water/sewer tax and the large poperty tax people will star moving out. It&#8217;s 10% now at the boats and 9.225 in other parts of KC..</p>
<p>Someone soon will go up aganist Clay&#8217;s plan to stop it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://kclightrail.com/2007/07/18/chastain-v-kansas-city-and-the-hancock-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kclightrail.com/2007/07/18/chastain-v-kansas-city-and-the-hancock-amendment/#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>you are quite welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you are quite welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mainstream</title>
		<link>http://kclightrail.com/2007/07/18/chastain-v-kansas-city-and-the-hancock-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-1323</link>
		<dc:creator>mainstream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 15:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kclightrail.com/2007/07/18/chastain-v-kansas-city-and-the-hancock-amendment/#comment-1323</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great post! Finally we&#039;re seeing some information that helps most voters begin to understand the issues pertaining to light rail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great post! Finally we&#8217;re seeing some information that helps most voters begin to understand the issues pertaining to light rail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
