Comments on: Phoenix Light Rail Spurring Development http://kclightrail.com/2006/12/28/phoenix-light-rail-spurring-development/ Your source for news and information on Kansas City's light rail progress Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:14:01 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: northlander http://kclightrail.com/2006/12/28/phoenix-light-rail-spurring-development/comment-page-1/#comment-417 northlander Sun, 03 Jun 2007 20:29:53 +0000 http://kclightrail.com/2006/12/28/phoenix-light-rail-spurring-development/#comment-417 Troost would make the best paid route. There are plenty of empty lots to build on and I am sure some housing money should be coming on track with very little TIF money needed or taking anyones land. Start at Volker BLVD by UMKC go to Main St and turn east go pass the Nelson Art turn north on troost to 27th St to the Hospital. People could get to jobs ,school and shopping. Just hope we have public input and the "Funk" doesen't leave the people out. Apartment or Condo's could be built on troost to make for even higher ridership. It's a win win for the eastside to get to work and shopping. Troost would make the best paid route. There are plenty of empty lots to build on and I am sure some housing money should be coming on track with very little TIF money needed or taking anyones land. Start at Volker BLVD by UMKC go to Main St and turn east go pass the Nelson Art turn north on troost to 27th St to the Hospital. People could get to jobs ,school and shopping.
Just hope we have public input and the “Funk” doesen’t leave the people out. Apartment or Condo’s could be built on troost to make for even higher ridership. It’s a win win for the eastside to get to work and shopping.

]]> By: Jim http://kclightrail.com/2006/12/28/phoenix-light-rail-spurring-development/comment-page-1/#comment-28 Jim Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:58:40 +0000 http://kclightrail.com/2006/12/28/phoenix-light-rail-spurring-development/#comment-28 As far as the proposed route goes, wouldn't it make more sense to run light rail through the Troost corridor? The Troost Corridor already carries a large percentage of people each day. In other words, a Troost line would meet with immediate success in terms of ridership. Second, look at how many bus routes intersect with Troost (off the top of my head I'm thinking the 39, 75, 12, 27?) - my point, the Chastain proposed route is too long and doesn't necessarily connect with bus routes. Third, as reports all indicate, light rail lines spur economic development. Troost is coming back - think about what a proposed line could do to hasten that economic redevelopment. I know that the ATA is studying the Troost corridor for the next BRT/Max like route - I'm not sure how that makes sense given the already heavy use of the Troost line - it would seem to me that converting the Troost route to a BRT would be a waste of money (given the need to purchase new busses . . .) As much as I appreciate the Max, and as much as I think the current Max Route was well planned and executed, I'm not sure putting different style busses on a already heavily used route make sense. How will a BRT spur economic development? As far as the proposed route goes, wouldn’t it make more sense to run light rail through the Troost corridor? The Troost Corridor already carries a large percentage of people each day. In other words, a Troost line would meet with immediate success in terms of ridership. Second, look at how many bus routes intersect with Troost (off the top of my head I’m thinking the 39, 75, 12, 27?) – my point, the Chastain proposed route is too long and doesn’t necessarily connect with bus routes. Third, as reports all indicate, light rail lines spur economic development. Troost is coming back – think about what a proposed line could do to hasten that economic redevelopment.

I know that the ATA is studying the Troost corridor for the next BRT/Max like route – I’m not sure how that makes sense given the already heavy use of the Troost line – it would seem to me that converting the Troost route to a BRT would be a waste of money (given the need to purchase new busses . . .) As much as I appreciate the Max, and as much as I think the current Max Route was well planned and executed, I’m not sure putting different style busses on a already heavily used route make sense. How will a BRT spur economic development?

]]> By: nick http://kclightrail.com/2006/12/28/phoenix-light-rail-spurring-development/comment-page-1/#comment-9 nick Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:25:54 +0000 http://kclightrail.com/2006/12/28/phoenix-light-rail-spurring-development/#comment-9 Broadway used to see heavy pedestrian usage through Midtown, around the VFW building, as well as further South. Broadway used to see heavy pedestrian usage through Midtown, around the VFW building, as well as further South.

]]>